Creationism evolution carbon dating

This could have been done by supernatural intervention by God during the Creation week and before and during the Flood.When Creationists use these assumptions, they can get results under 6,000 years!A few years ago on Mount Saint Helens, scientists dated the only decades-old rock formed by the volcano's explosion in 1980 and got millions of years.This is because daughter elements were in the original sample when the rock was formed at the explosion of the volcano.It is not unreasonable to assume that God used the energy of accelerated radioactive decay to initiate and drive the major geologic changes in the earth that accompanied the Flood" (answersingenesis.org).In other words, RATE has found evidence, through how different dating methods come up with different ages of the same rock samples, that the decay rates of certain elements' have been faster in the past than they are now.However, we know we can get dates much earlier than millions of years if we use the right assumptions.There are thousands of different types of dating methods, and 90% of them support a young earth.

Another significant method to note is Carbon-14 dating.As for the second assumption, it is highly unlikely.We have not been to the distant past, so we do not know what the conditions were back then.However, with these assumptions, there is such a wide range of inaccurate results that Creationists rarely use this process to date rocks.With even the teeniest alteration in the assumptions, they can get a date that is completely inaccurate.

Search for creationism evolution carbon dating:

creationism evolution carbon dating-76creationism evolution carbon dating-46creationism evolution carbon dating-12

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “creationism evolution carbon dating”